Posted on 10/20/2012 10:49:07 PM PDT by Altariel
(Do I really need a sarc tag?)
I’m just wondering, if you were to trace police hierarchy to the top, is it a Muslim at the top?
I’m being semi-serious on this, because there are too many of these types of shootings to be accidental.
That is an excellent question.
Such dog killings would certainly be palatable (moreover, delightful) to a Muslim.
However, one need not worship the false god Allah to loathe the creations of the true Yahweh.
It may be a case of “there is no god but the State and the officer is its prophet.” Dogs that don’t serve the interest of the state? Well, they may be eliminated at the discretion of the government employee(s) present.
Those who worship false gods tend to have low regard for that which Yahweh created.
Freegards,
scumbag cops like this need to be taken down. they do this to innocent people as well when they do no-knocks on wrong addresses, the people are defending themselves from what they think is a home invasion.
They need to raid a few wrong addresses ‘on purpose.’
Police won’t behave like decent human beings until citizens start shooting back at them for a change.
Horror stories over at the Muckraker.
What is puzzling is why would an attorney pursuing such a lawsuit (which at most might yield $10,000 or so as it is considered a property tort in the eyes of the law — hardly anything a city that gets routinely slapped with million dollar judgments ought to care about) get threats against his own children? @$$4073$!
Does this man have so little concern for his dogs that he keeps them around his pot growing operation?
Even if I was FOR drug legalization, which I am not, I would not subject animals or kids to the possibility of a drug raid. What kind of person would?
Can anybody establish that any pot was found?
Every non-cop is a dog lover.
Drugs aren’t going to be legalized because the drug war brings in too much revenue for the courts, police depts, and other agencies involved.
None of them have any intention of winning the war eitherif they were truly serious about it, decisive actions could’ve been taken decades ago, such as sealing off the border and what not.
When the country was more devout it had much less difficulty with crime connected with intoxicants, which were also much less difficult to get. Seems to me that every year, more “things” get banned, as though they could chase after people and cause them to do bad things on their own accord, and we see more and more novel intoxicants. Who would have ever dreamed the old “Calgon, take me away” commercials would become literal? (Bath salts)
Yup... a good FENCE at the border would do a whale of a lot to stanch the Mexican-US narcotics traffic.
I am a non cop and a cat lover. I favor cats over dogs.
Still, there are things even a dog does not deserve. This was one of them. PETA where are you when we need you.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jE3cpsdMg3Q
“President Obama: “Dog Eater,” the Music Video”
I didn’t save the link but I just read that 0bama gave Libya money to secure their borders.
“Every non-cop is a dog lover.”
I really doubt that’s true. My mom hates dogs, and has nothing to do with law enforcement, for example.
Also I imagine there are plenty of cops that love dogs, although I don’t know any cops, personally.
‘Can anybody establish that any pot was found?”
None that I see in the story. However it doesn’t mention that it was actually a mistaken raid.
My point stands whether the guy is guilty of not, and it is this: should you really have vulnerable people, or vulnerable animals, around, if you want to engage in illegal activity that is known for violent scenarios.
Let’s suppose I really think I should be allowed to run a meth lab. I think it’s great for people, and that nanny state government should let me cook all the dope I want. Should I keep my kids around the lab? Or my dogs? Or my cockatoo? That is, if I want to keep them out of harm’s way?
I say I should. It is hard for me to feel sorry for the man since he apparently had his dogs around either for his companionship or his protection, without regard for THEIR safety. I am sorry for the dogs, however, who are guilty of nothing, apparently.
What pot growing operation?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.