[tacticalogic]

It is hard for me to feel sorry for the man since he apparently had his dogs around either for his companionship or his protection, without regard for THEIR safety.

Where is tht apparent? At this point, it's admitted that there is no evidence of his guilt presented. It's like a Pavlovian reaction to the word 'pot' appearing in the title.

[Persevero]

“Where is tht apparent? At this point, it’s admitted that there is no evidence of his guilt presented. It’s like a Pavlovian reaction to the word ‘pot’ appearing in the title. “

The only place it’s apparent is in the title - pot “bust” - which leads me to believe he was arrested, which leads me to believe there was enough evidence to sustain an arrest - of course I don’t know for a fact, as the story is none too helpful in that area.

My response in not pavlovian. I just notice the cops getting very viciously characterized and no one seems to care that the owner had so little (apparent) concern for his dogs’ safety. He bears responsibility for that.