well, for classification, what term would you use to define a person who identifies with a pre-columbus ethnicity?
“well, for classification, what term would you use to define a person who identifies with a pre-columbus ethnicity?”
Injuns!
“well, for classification, what term would you use to define a person who identifies with a pre-columbus ethnicity?”
North Asian migrants
>>well, for classification, what term would you use to define a person who identifies with a pre-columbus ethnicity?
Aboriginal Americans?
The areas of the country largely settled by white Americans of pre-Revolutionary ancestry have a high percentage of persons who self-identify as Americans. This is true in the Deep South, northern New England, and the Ohio Valley. A similar phenomenon may be noted among English-speaking Canadians, who increasingly self-identify as Canadians rather than Scots, English, Irish, etc.
As for the American Indian/Native American, there is no really good term, unless we use the term aborigine, as the Australians do, or Original People, a term used by the Canadian government.
Asian invader
Asian immigrants!
‘well, for classification, what term would you use to define a person who identifies with a pre-columbus ethnicity?’
extinct?
“well, for classification, what term would you use to define a person who identifies with a pre-columbus ethnicity?”
Amerindian, except for the Eskimo-Aleut Liguistic Family such as the Aleuts, Alutiiq, Cupik, Yupik, and Inuit peoples of the northeern regions of North America.
The Amerindians represent at least two to three or more prehistoric immigrant populations having very different physical and cultural characteristics.
Are you aware of a recent court decision in, I think, Louisiana, that puts limits on the land that the tribes can claim as sacred? The case has the potential to be a watershed case, allowing the liberals to pick and choose in which areas to give the tribes preferential treatment.