Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

History Channel program probes Mayan presence in North Georgia
Morris News Service ^ | 21 Dec 2012 | Wayne Ford

Posted on 12/24/2012 8:48:15 PM PST by Theoria

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: Theoria

Why not? AMericans has established outposts a hell of a lot further away than that.

What do you think they will look like in 700 years.


21 posted on 12/25/2012 3:25:14 AM PST by Vermont Lt (We are so screwed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf9
The Mayans are from Mexico. They migrated to the United States. Nobody asked them to come here

My ancestors are from Europe. They migrated to the Americas. Nobody asked them to come here.

Turns out people always have and always will migrate.

22 posted on 12/25/2012 5:07:31 AM PST by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

Any civilization generally spreads out from a center, with evidence of its presence stronger the closer to that center.

This means that one would expect strong evidence of Mayan presence in the Caribbean, Florida and south Georgia, which AFAIK does not exist, not an isolated presence in north Georgia.

It’s not like they had the option of establishing free-standing colonies supported by air, like ours in Afghanistan and Central Asia.

I’ve read similar accounts of Viking presence in Minnesota or Alberta, with no particular explanation of why they would have bypassed other lands between. When the later Euro settlers of history showed up, it took them centuries to reach these areas.


23 posted on 12/25/2012 5:11:25 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

The Stephen Lekson rules......

Everybody knew everything
Distance was not a problem
There is no coincedence


24 posted on 12/25/2012 5:15:39 AM PST by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....The fairest Deduction to be reduced is the Standard Deduction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

I would think they didn’t necessarily bypass the lands in between. We’re just stuck with the few places where some evidence has been found. In this case, it seems completely reasonable that Mayans might have travelled all over the Caribbean area and pushed up the coast. I suspect that wide travel and trade was wider and earlier than has often been assumed.


25 posted on 12/25/2012 5:30:06 AM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us one chance in three. More tea anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

They only found dirty Mayans in Georgia!


26 posted on 12/25/2012 5:36:45 AM PST by 2nd Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

I have no problem with extensive trade, but if the Mayans were to establish settlements in North Georgia, why are the not identifiable Mayan ruins near Mobile, Pensacola and Miami?

I would think these are the ruins of the precursor tribes to the Cherokee, Creek and other tribes of Southern US.


27 posted on 12/25/2012 6:06:17 AM PST by Fraxinus (My opinion, worth what you paid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen

Higher quality? when did they ever have shows likeEureka or Stargate? Lower quality than E! Wich at least has The Soup.


28 posted on 12/25/2012 6:17:39 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen

Higher quality? when did they ever have shows likeEureka or Stargate? Lower quality than E! Wich at least has The Soup.


29 posted on 12/25/2012 6:17:50 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen

Higher quality? when did they ever have shows likeEureka or Stargate? Lower quality than E! Wich at least has The Soup.


30 posted on 12/25/2012 6:17:50 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fraxinus

Thing is, there is evidence the Creek migrateed from central America and western Mexico.

The ruins I have stumbled across were near major rivers, the major “highways” of early inhabitants in this country.

We do not see evidence of early settlements in this country very often, mainly because virtually no one leaves the interstates when travelling.

Here are just a couple links that are likely just modern names for ancient peoples.

http://lostworlds.org/ocmulgee_mounds/

http://www.exploresouthernhistory.com/kolomoki1.html


31 posted on 12/25/2012 6:59:44 AM PST by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Dem

Nope. Ain’t wrong. The people of Tonga were not allowed into the Priesthood until 1978 and they are called Lamaminites by many LDS.

A term of derision and bigotry.


32 posted on 12/25/2012 7:56:56 AM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

bottom line is that the DNA shows them to ultimately be siberian based - and not Jewish.


33 posted on 12/25/2012 8:16:16 AM PST by Godzilla (3/7/77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen
For he benefit of those who didn't see the program, the evidence presented was as follows:

1.) Topographical data taken from an aerial survey tends to suggest the presence of temple mounds identical to those found in Mayan cities. This was interesting, but not very convincing, one way or the other.

2.) Several artifacts were shown that were found in the same region of the suspected temple mounds that appear to have Mayan iconography. The match in styles was very striking, but the provenance of the artifacts was unknown.

3.) Linguistic similarities between Mayan and the local Cree tongue, including the names that several tribes called themselves seemed to be derived from classical Maya. This was interesting, but, again, not pursued in much depth.

4.) The Mayans used great quantities of a pigment known as "Mayan Blue", yet no source of the clay upon which it was based has been found in Mexico, aside from a few small deposits. However, the clay used for Mayan Blue turns out to be commonplace in the area of Georgia where the suspected temple mounds are located. An x-ray spectrograph done on a known sample of Myan Blue from Mexico showed that the clay used to make it carried the identical chemical signatiure of the Georgia clay.

In the end, it was interesting and not a completely lunatic suggestion, but not terribly well developed, but then what could you expect.

34 posted on 12/25/2012 10:09:58 AM PST by PUGACHEV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Godzilla

Nohhhhh!?!?!

/s

Merry Christmas


35 posted on 12/25/2012 12:35:46 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Merry Christmas, glad you’re still in here once in a while. :’)


36 posted on 12/27/2012 4:32:15 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Theoria; aposiopetic; Renfield; LucyT; blam

 GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother & Ernest_at_the_Beach
Thanks Theoria, and for the additional ping, thanks indcons. Just adding to the catalog, not sending a general distribution.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.


37 posted on 12/27/2012 4:35:21 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mnehring

There was a lot of merchandise moving back and forth across very long distances in the pre-Columbian eras. If there was something the Mayans wanted here in Georgia, there is every chance the Mayans, or some representatives of their culture, came here.


38 posted on 12/27/2012 4:51:53 PM PST by Little Ray (Get back to work. Your urban masters need their EBTs refilled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paisan

Depends on what you consider evidence. The have found turquoise from Arizona in Central American digs.


39 posted on 12/27/2012 4:56:46 PM PST by Little Ray (Get back to work. Your urban masters need their EBTs refilled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
Nope. Ain’t wrong. The people of Tonga were not allowed into the Priesthood until 1978 and they are called Lamaminites by many LDS.

A term of derision and bigotry.

Yes, you are STILL wrong. I know Tongans who held the LDS Priesthood in 1968 (and obviously long before that), and Samoans, and Hawaiians. It is you who are the bigot.

40 posted on 12/31/2012 11:35:35 PM PST by Auntie Dem (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson