Related thread:
Does NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) keep two separate sets of climate books ...
fyi
If a point of focus is arranged, and discussion of that arranged focus ensues, there will be discussion.
Few are concerned about the motives of the discussion of the focus as the focus exists as a truth to discuss. It’s there, and it’s being discussed.
If the focus is removed.......
It’s sort of like the guy standing on the corner looking up at the sky, and of a sudden there are three, or more looking up at the sky around him. Then there are more, and more. Soon people depart towards their previous destinations as nothing is there for them to see none the wiser they’ve been played for fools.
They haven’t even adjusted the 1998 data yet.
More of Hansen’s work?
This tells me that NOAA has been gradually infiltrated with Warmest environmentalists who have an agenda to carry out. 2 years ago when world temperatures were among the coldest ever recorded, the very same organizations were saying that the temperature fluctuations are no refutation of global warming. But now a few years later we have record warm temperatures and here they come to tell us that temperatures have everything to do with global warming. So, by their logic, if temperatures rise, that’s global warming/climate change. But if temperatures fall and produce the coldest winters on record -—well that’s global warming/climate change too.
So what if this is true? Records have been kept a very short period of time and even if true for the US, there were other areas that are suffering from extreme cold. It’s all cyclical.
And December 2012 just had the greatest snow coverage for any December in the past 45 years in the Northern Hemisphere.