“Bennett cannot claim ignorance. He was informed by an attorney of exactly what Onaka’s verification said and what it meant.”
Neither can any of the 50 states’ Attorney Generals or 50 states’ Secretaries of State, all of whom received the exact same letter from Larry Klayman. And all of them ignored the letter.
That leaves several possiblities, 1) they deliberately chose to break the law and become accessories or 2) they disagreed with the legal position stated in the letter.
Did any of them even respond to Mr. Klayman?
I spoke to the legal counsel for my own SOS, and he said it was none of Nebraska’s business what Onaka verified to other states, and that Nebraska law doesn’t require the certification from the DNC to be LAWFUL (non-fraudulent and non-perjurious) so even if the signers were sitting in jail for fraud and perjury, Obama’s name would still be on the ballot.
First he said that the body of the letter wasn’t addressed specifically to John Gale (implying that he didn’t have to read it) so I asked if he had read it. Yes, he had read it. Then he tried to say that Bennett had never even asked for male, Aug 4, 1961, Honolulu, Oahu, Stanley Ann Dunham, and Barack Hussein Obama to be verified. I had to show him the “in addition to the items to be verified in the attached form...” statement. Then he went into the reasons it doesn’t matter if fraud and perjury were committed, and that NE doesn’t have to care what Onaka revealed to anybody else...
He was not able to refute the legal reasoning. He eventually tried to say that there might be a birthday card from somebody that would prove he was born in Hawaii. I said that it would have to be LEGALLY DETERMINED. No lawyer or average citizen can look at a birthday card and legally determine somebody’s birth facts from that. There are procedures that have to be followed in order to make legal determinations, and that’s when evidence like birthday cards would come in. But Obama has not allowed that procedure to happen. Without doing so, he has no LEGALLY DETERMINED birth facts.
The guy acted like he didn’t know the difference between somebody CERTIFYING that a legal fact is true, and somebody off the street pretending they are judge and jury, over and against Hawaii statutes.
Some SOS’s responded to my personal letter that I sent, totally ignoring the substance of what I had sent - as if they didn’t even read the letter. Sickening.