Please explain away the frivolous claims of forgery shown here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2977726/posts?page=11#11
To start:
http://raisedonhoecakes.com/ROH/2011/06/24/still-here-trying-to-teach-pigs-to-sing/
http://raisedonhoecakes.com/ROH/2011/07/09/we-get-letters-some-birthers-want-it-both-ways/
From the last link:
“You can contend all you want. That doesn’t mean it is true. Here are the two letters superimposed on each other. Letter #3 is in black. Letter #143 is in red.”
“Are there differences? Yes. As we said there would be. Are there “stylistic differences?” No.”
“Furthermore the large “R” is the two “R’s” in Irey’s chart as given. The smaller “R’s” are those in what would be a comparable 12 point size, which would most likely have been the font size used. (If not, it would have been smaller, not larger)”
“As anyone can see the differences are within what one would expect due to the scan errors alone, much less the “noise” errors due to the background, etc.”
Here is his link to the two “R”s referenced in the above snippet.
http://raisedonhoecakes.com/ROH/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Irey-R-ROH2.jpg
In addition Paul Irey was admited as an expert in typesetting (the BC is not a typeset document) in the Indiana court. The judge in the hearing cut short the cross examination of Mr. Irey (unheard of in normal court proceedings) and ended the hearing. Judge Reid shortly after that dismissed the case and all of the testimony from the hearing was stricken from the record.
