Sorry, but declarative sentences like this should make intelligent people giggle. There is no way any one could possibly know this factual.
The sentence you quote begins with, "Mr. Romilo says," which should tell us (whether we are "intelligent people" or not-so-much), that what follows is Mr. Romilo's opinion.
So, how valid is Mr. Romilo's opinion?
Well, the article tells us that Romilo is a PhD candidate and that he led the study, so we can surmise it's at least an educated opinion.
We might also presume that Romilo found evidence of every characteristic mentioned:
In short, those all appear reasonable conclusions based on scientific evidence -- certainly not, in your words, "known facts", but most likely as close to "known facts" as we will ever get.
How valid is Mr. Romilo's opinion?
Until somebody finds evidence of shoddy workmanship, or some new theory to explain geological features, Romilo's work might well stand the tests of time.
So what is your problem with it?