“We need similar laws passed in every state.”
Only in a Marxist dreamland. The foreclosure process is needed so a lender can attempt to recoup a bad loan.
Otherwise the lender has an unsecured loan. Lenders don’t want to make $300,000 unsecured loans. The real estate as collateral allows those loans to made in the first place.
Take the loan collateral away by making foreclosure impossible; and lenders won’t lend.
How about this concept? People pay their loans.
Only in a Marxist dreamland. The foreclosure process is needed so a lender can attempt to recoup a bad loan.
**************************************************
We’ve been over this before , the FALSE , FAKE , FRAUDULENT documents are because it ISN’T the actual lender that is foreclosing. If they were an actual party to the transaction they wouldn’t be BREAKING THE LAW with their WHITE COLLAR CRIMES. If they weren’t breaking the law the changes to the law wouldn’t have affected their foreclosure processing AT ALL.
How about this concept? People pay their loans.
************************************************
How about this concept? Banks follow the law.
How about this concept? Bank lawyers that file fraudulent documents to steal a house they have no interest in GO TO JAIL.
“Take the loan collateral away by making foreclosure impossible; and lenders wont lend.”
It is amazing how people can’t grasp this simple principle.
If you think the real estate market is bad now? Force lenders to require 50% or more downpayment - which is what would happen (if you could get a loan at all) by making it difficult for them to foreclose.
You’ll turn a good chunk of Southern California into Detroit in less than a decade. Property tax receipts would plummet, public services would evaporate, and that would be the end of it. Sure, you stopped foreclosures, but you killed everything that depends on property rights being honored, which is pretty much everything!
"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes it's laws" Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild 1790 though original sourcing is questionable
"Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it." Woodrow Wilson The New Freedom 1913
So we speak above a whisper about laws to stifle this conspiracy that a president warned about over a hundred years ago, and you want to call it Marxist to resist. OMG!