Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Winston
They clearly rejected him on all those points, and there is nothing to even faintly suggest they followed his ideas on citizenship.

Other than several Supreme Court decisions that specifically use Vattel's definiton and go so far as to characterize it as the "nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar ..."

102 posted on 03/07/2013 9:22:08 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: edge919

The phrase you use referred not to Vattel, but to the common law. And whenever the Court says “the common law,” that includes the English common law which was our heritage.

It’s the same common law that the Wong Court referred to repeatedly, over dozens of pages.

The remedy for a bad President is to scratch and claw at the bad President, not to scratch and claw at our Constitution.


103 posted on 03/07/2013 11:25:26 PM PST by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson