Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ksen

If it would save ME and MY family money, while not compromising our health care, I MIGHT be for it. After I look at the red tape and small print.

But I provide excellent coverage for my family at considerable personal expense. When you add in me having to pay to cover the lame, the lazy, etc., what you propose is impossible.


51 posted on 03/14/2013 8:38:31 AM PDT by Little Ray (Waiting for the return of the Gods of the Copybook Headings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Little Ray

To clarify just a bit.

NO.

I am not going to accept paying extra for lame, lazy, weak, stupid and perverted on the grounds that it might cost less overall. If anything, I’d cut expense by cutting them off. Nobody has a right to anything for which someone else has to pay.


58 posted on 03/14/2013 8:42:10 AM PDT by Little Ray (Waiting for the return of the Gods of the Copybook Headings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson