Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ksen
How much of this innovation is because of government spending on basic research?

Nonsense. People like you argue that the NIH is some savvy investor, facilitating pivotal research because no other private entity can. Private pharmaceutical companies, for example, foot a significant amount of the costs of drug development, and they do it in a much more cost-effective way.

94 posted on 03/14/2013 9:17:43 AM PDT by Lou L (Health "insurance" is NOT the same as health "care")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: Lou L
Private pharmaceutical companies, for example, foot a significant amount of the costs of drug development, and they do it in a much more cost-effective way.

No they don't.

Pharmaceutical R&D – its cost and what it delivers

Data from companies, the United States National Science Foundation, and government reports indicate that companies have been spending only 1.3% of revenues on basic research to discover new molecules, net of taxpayer subsidies. More than four fifths of all funds for basic research to discover new drugs and vaccines come from public sources.

Pharmaceutical Companies Spent 19 Times More On Self-Promotion Than Basic Research: Report

106 posted on 03/14/2013 9:32:11 AM PDT by ksen (". . . organized greed always defeats disorganized democracy" - Matt Taibbi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson