Stating facts is “sputtering” to you? Hilarious, but sad for you. You are the one who has been chasing rabbits for the past 10 posts or so — and you are NOT fooling anyone here. I’d say most of the posters here on this thread are seeing right through you and your attempts to dodge the issue: an unwarranted killing of a dog by cops. You are the one who seems to think that’s not the issue. Regardless of the type or breed of dog chained — and regardless of whether or not one approves of chaining or leashing in the home (separate issue) — this man’s dog was killed and was clearly no threat. Cops entered into his home —without cause and killed his leashed dog. Clear enough for you, now????
First you tried stating the owner was in the kitchen when the shooting occurred. That certainly wasn't a fact, was it?
Frankly, I’m just bored with AW’s non-answer answers and agonizingly repetitive ‘stats’.
If they start quoting the dog-bite law site as “proof”, I *might* break out in laughter, though.
[although the bizarre straw man foray into another poster’s ability to pay for a kennel was amusing...in a warped, non-linear kind of way]