Sounds like a loudmouth. His reasoning leads him to say Zimmerman shouldn’t have been as prepared as he was to defend himself, and should rather have further risked his own death or more serious injuries than he’s already had.
I never really listened to Savage before, and after this I won’t be seeking to listen to him again. Savage ends this by saying that he’s able to hear what’s otherwise inaudible (so we’re to take this on faith I guess): Zimmerman saying ‘f*ing coons’, and that’s why Zimmerman must be found guilty. Does that sound like a well-reasoned conservative to anyone here? What has Savage said about ‘creepy ass cracker’ utterances in his show? I’d have to compare his opinions regarding both, if Zimmerman even said that to the 911 operator.
The PROSECUTION began their opening statement with two words: “F*cking punks.” Savage is so late to the party and out of the loop on this he does not even know the state has conceded that Z did NOT say “coons.” David Horowitz is also ignorant about this case. BARF.
Was "coon" heard in the doctored tape? Did he really say "coon"?