Correction: She is trying hard to throw the case to the prosecution without getting caught red-handed.
Correction: She is trying hard to throw the case to the prosecution without getting caught red-handed.
I think it would be hilarious if they dismissed the jury to deliberate and as they walk out, one of them sez, “Be right back!”
“She is trying hard to throw the case to the prosecution without getting caught red-handed.”
‘Guess she must be an atheist ‘cause she sure doesn’t believe in hell.
I know the theory that supports the protection from liability for judges and prosecutors is that it nurtures their alleged impartiality and allows them to make decisions in a vacuum beyond political restraint
Judges and prosecutors are just lazy and arrogant attorneys who for the most part couldn't cut it in the private sector.
the judiciary is almost always stilted and stilted most often towards the prosecution ... and once they get a taste of the (non)workload and public tit you can't pry them off with a crowbar
perhaps the remedy for such institutionalized messianic arrogance is to allow other than attorneys back into these positions and severely term limit them as well
the crime within the courtroom is brandished in our faces with virtual impunity each day (as is so obvious here)
there are many Mike Nifongs and bench-sitters who condone and support them ... but scant few are ever held accountable
maybe their standards for liability should be revisited as well
.