Posted on 07/22/2013 2:53:48 PM PDT by Lee N. Field
What I read in what was posted is pretty typical of anti-gun libs -
“_I_ can’t be trusted with a gun, so no one else can be either.”
“Guns scare me, so you can’t have one.”
She’s not straddling the line between responsible and idiot, she’s an idiot.
From the time they were little I’ve given my kids unloaded guns to play with after explaining to them the dangers and setting up the rules. I got their gun curiosity all out of them. If you make it a taboo, then they’ll have it in mind all the time.
I would haul them out, let them play with them as long as they wanted. Eventually, they tired of touching and holding them. As they got big enough we’d go shooting. They knew that a gun is a tool, neither good nor bad.
Of course, liberals are control freaks, so liberty is out of the question.
Interesting how liberals moralize the inanimate, like guns or profits.
On the other hand, an unborn baby is inanimate - a blob of tissue with no value or moral aspect.
**********************************************************
Rock solid and well said.
If it ever existed is the key here. Some ‘friend’ melted the Glock down for her...so it wouldn’t be used in a crime.
She’s dumb or a liar or both.
If it ever existed is the key here. Some friend melted the Glock down for her...so it wouldnt be used in a crime.Shes dumb or a liar or both.
There's sooo much about the story she spins that doesn't "smell right". But, to bring it up in her venues (the Ms. blog, whatever the other one was) would be considered "threatening", probably.
It’s about as believable as a love affair between George Soros and Sarah Palin.
Haven’t heard that one before.
How about 'scrimmage'?
Or 'a workout' with a partner?
Maybe 'undress rehearsal'?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.