Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Diego1618
How about from the pen of the man who "coined the term"...

He didn't coin the term--he wrote in French, and his phrase in French does not include the words for "born" or "citizen." You quote a translation, but not the only possible translation, and one which was (some say) not published until well after the Constitution was written. That suggests the translator may have gotten his wording from our Constitution, not the other way around.

119 posted on 08/12/2013 9:01:24 AM PDT by Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical

Didn’t George Washington have a copy of the Law Of Nations in his library at home? If so, which language version?


120 posted on 08/12/2013 9:29:32 AM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
He didn't coin the term--he wrote in French, and his phrase in French does not include the words for "born" or "citizen."

What does it say then....."A Natural"?

I can see it now: “The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or "naturals", are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”

LOL...........the last sentence kind of sums it up.....no matter what the Frogs called it.

How about this quote from John Jay, the first Chief Justice:

"Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and reasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen."

Do you suppose he knew what the term implied....... or was he just playing around with words?

137 posted on 08/12/2013 2:35:24 PM PDT by Diego1618 (Put "Ron" on the Rock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson