Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Pearls Before Swine
"I get Scientific American because of the stimulating articles in obscure areas of science, written by experts. I overlook the obvious global warming bias that often creeps in."

Since you know that the global warming articles are inaccurate, what leads you to believe that the other articles are accurate? I follow the philosophy that once a lie is told, never believe the liar again.

33 posted on 08/22/2013 7:07:38 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: norwaypinesavage
Since you know that the global warming articles are inaccurate, what leads you to believe that the other articles are accurate? I follow the philosophy that once a lie is told, never believe the liar again.

The articles are not written by the same people, and most articles are not written by the editorial staff. The articles that interest me are written by people who are authorities in their field, and should I need anything more than the watered down explanation for the general reading, they usually have a few external references.

48 posted on 08/22/2013 7:18:03 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson