[nesnah]

Maybe we can have a discussion on the “Intent” and “True Meaning” of the Commerce Clause?

We here all know how that’s been bastardized. Are we to do the same thing again?

[highball]

Maybe we can have a discussion on the “Intent” and “True Meaning” of the Commerce Clause?

We here all know how that’s been bastardized. Are we to do the same thing again?

I agree (thank Scalia for that one), but it's not remotely relevant. At least the Commerce Clause is actually in in the Constitution, unlike this nonsense:

The Cliff Notes version very clearly indicates that a “natural born citizen” is one born in a country whose parents are both citizens of that country.

You made an assertion of fact, I challenged you to back it up with an actual citation from our Founding Documents to buttress your "clearly indicate(d)" line. You have yet to do so.