Posted on 09/05/2013 10:36:52 AM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
If you recall in 2008 on Obama's own campaign website Fight The Smears, it stated:
'The truth is, Barack Obama was born in the state of Hawaii in 1961, a native citizen of the United States of America.'
Does Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution specifically call for a native born Citizen to be president? No it does not. It states:
'No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;....'
Here is the link to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services website that the above information is no longer available.
http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-45077/0-0-0-48575.html
Because we all refused to believe democrats and now republicans would ever allow the implementation of the Communist Manifesto we paid for it to happen via our public schools and now we have enough communists or Progressives (one in the same) who control our information.
We lost everything the founders created.
There still people who claim to be conservative who still send their kids to government schools and somehow are expecting a middle of the road outcome.
There no longer any information reality! We surrendered the right to have our government be honest long ago.
A president can tell a nationwide audience about his red line and a year later claims he never said it and 1/2 the country just ignores it because he is the right color.
Because we accept lying this is the best we can expect from government. Until lying is a impeachable offense NOTHING WILL EVER CHANGE.
Move to chat, out of breaking news.
Ping!
I actually had a note sent from a FR poster here....
just asserting that “there is no such thing as natural born citizen”
I used to enjoy watching 3 stooges cartoons, but REALLY! our educational system has hit a new bottom!
wow!
Here WaybackMachine.
Shhhhhhhhh! Don’t tell xzins!
/Morning%20Has%20Broken%20(Dureco).jpg)
They have scrubbed much more than that specific interpretation:
Go to the USCIS website and search for:
“Reacquisition of citizenship lost by marriage”
When you go to many of the links that returns they have the same statement that the page no longer exists.
They did a large general scrub job.
I suggest that everyone who is interested in this issue should save a copy of this webpage to their computer because I’ve no doubt that the traces of this page will soon be scrubbed from the net.
tinfoil hat stuff. the usc has not changed and there has only ever been two forms of citizen.
try thomas.gov and look in usc.
The website ‘Obama Release Your Records’ picked up my thread back on April 3, 2013 and published it.
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2013/04/ins-proves-obama-not-eligible.html
People the world over are carefully watching the progress of Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse’s.
It is at the top of every news hour. It is the headline of every newspaper. It is the lead story of Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, and Sean Hannity.
or?
Your link NEVER proved anything. Regulations and websites cover more than one term without meaning that the terms have separate definitions.
And links die all the time. When a link dies to a horse training site, I don’t accuse the owners of trying to hide some valuable training technique!
The link provides proof that native-born and natural-born are different subsets of citizen. They are not the same.
Since the beginning, Team Obama has attempted to obscure this rather simple concept with one smokescreen after another.
There is no way they could attempt to prove his constitutional eligibility, but to use the weak pretext of native birth. Hence the entire born-in-Hawaii BC nightmare.
Tell me SCOTUS, is one citizen parent enough to claim "natural born Citizen?" Is birth in the country alone enough to claim it? Tell me please exactly what "natural born Citizen" means.
No, it did not. Using “native-born or natural-born citizen” in a regulation does NOT mean the terms have separate definitions. It merely means both were in common use, as here:
“But the Secretary of State, according to the allegation of the bill of complaint, had refused to issue a passport to Miss Elg “solely on the ground that she had lost her native born American citizenship.” The court below, properly recognizing the existence of an actual controversy with the defendants (Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Haworth, 300 U. S. 227), declared Miss Elg “to be a natural born citizen of the United States,” and we think that the decree should include the Secretary of State as well as the other defendants.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.