Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cripplecreek
I answered your question in post 48, now I would like to continue it by looking at your statement, but I need a little clarification.

In my genealogy research I’m finding a lot of ancestors on the frontier who lived together as husband and wife for years before a traveling minister would come along and marry them.

"Lot's" of ancestors on the frontier with no access to a minister or official or who could post a Bann on a church door or obtain a license, that is a little hard to believe that you would have lot's of them.

What years were these, in which colonies or states?

65 posted on 09/06/2013 4:15:16 PM PDT by ansel12 ( Libertarians, the left's social agenda with conservatism's economics, which is impossible of course)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

He is right. The practice was quite common on the frontier from the beginning right up into the 20th Century. An example would be Wyatt Earp. He had two common law wives in his lifetime. There was no licenses or church weddings, they just lived as husband and wife. I would speculate that what we see today as common, the big church wedding was beyond the means of most in the 18th and 19th Centuries. Recently read a history of the Hatfield McCoy feud. Marriage was not done with govt. licenses or church for that matter. People just lived together and just proclaimed themselves married. As for gays(females only), they even had a name for it. When two old spinsters lived their lives together it was called a Boston Marriage in the 19th Century. They difference was that if someone did not like it, they were not forced to accept it themselves, unlike today.


72 posted on 09/06/2013 5:18:22 PM PDT by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson