Skip to comments.
(Vanity/Pre-beer) If I was Obama I would have attacked already.
09/06/2013
| Self
Posted on 09/06/2013 7:40:00 PM PDT by ReaganÜberAlles
The moment I had sufficient proof of the gassing I would have attacked.
TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
To: ReaganÃœberAlles
Heck, our founding fathers would have been FINISHED by now!!
2
posted on
09/06/2013 7:42:12 PM PDT
by
Fast Moving Angel
(A moral wrong is not a civil right: No religious sanction of an irreligious act.)
To: ReaganÃœberAlles
How do you know who did the bombing?
3
posted on
09/06/2013 7:42:53 PM PDT
by
autumnraine
(America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to thoe tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
To: ReaganÃœberAlles
That is just it, there is no definitive proof that Assad used nerve gas. Many sources are saying it was the rebels who gassed the civilians in order to try to draw the US into the war on their side.
4
posted on
09/06/2013 7:43:34 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the people. T Jefferson)
To: ReaganÃœberAlles
Do you think there is sufficient proof?
Which side is the good side?
5
posted on
09/06/2013 7:43:44 PM PDT
by
EEGator
To: Fast Moving Angel
I think he’ll get the Senate and attack at that point without waiting for the House. If he doesn’t he really is a commie pussy!
To: ReaganÃœberAlles
The Mayor of Boston has already said that he would bomb Detroit. Some folks just want to blow things up.
7
posted on
09/06/2013 7:44:38 PM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(21st century. I'm not a fan.)
To: ReaganÃœberAlles
Can’t wait to see your post-beer vanity.
8^)
8
posted on
09/06/2013 7:44:51 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: ReaganÃœberAlles
Yep. It’s about Syria’s port support and other support for Iran’s nuclear buildup.
9
posted on
09/06/2013 7:44:55 PM PDT
by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
To: ReaganÃœberAlles
It took Hillary’s balls to make a decision to take out bin Laden. hussein obamar didn’t have enough manhood to make the decision on his own.
I damn sure didn’t believe he would here either unless the Saudis, brotherhood, and al Qaeda convinced him otherwise.
10
posted on
09/06/2013 7:45:11 PM PDT
by
boycott
To: ReaganÃœberAlles
(Vanity/Pre-beer) If I was Obama I would have attacked already.Unfortunately, in any areas where these animals prevail, you can no more "prove" one side didn't do it, as the other. They're indistinguishable in both word and deed.
11
posted on
09/06/2013 7:45:38 PM PDT
by
publius911
(Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
To: ReaganÃœberAlles
Ooooh, boy. Waiting to see what you’ll do once you get to the tequila.
12
posted on
09/06/2013 7:45:44 PM PDT
by
Jane Long
(While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs stay silent.)
To: ReaganÃœberAlles
If you wuz Obama, one things we could say for him, you’d express yourself grammatically!
13
posted on
09/06/2013 7:46:02 PM PDT
by
Revolting cat!
(Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
To: autumnraine
I agree.
A whole lot of people, still have a whole lot of explaining to do.
At least that is my opinion.
To: ReaganÃœberAlles
“If I was Obama I would have attacked already.”
If I were Obama I’d earn that Nobel Peace prize by _______ myself. You can have fun filling in the blank.
15
posted on
09/06/2013 7:47:15 PM PDT
by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: ReaganÃœberAlles
Pre beer??? What’s the hold up?
16
posted on
09/06/2013 7:47:19 PM PDT
by
barmag25
To: ReaganÃœberAlles
So you want the US to attack any country that uses chemical weapons?
17
posted on
09/06/2013 7:48:24 PM PDT
by
Ken H
(First rule of gun safety - have a gun)
To: ReaganÃœberAlles
Why? What would it accomplish?
18
posted on
09/06/2013 7:48:30 PM PDT
by
RC one
To: ReaganÃœberAlles
19
posted on
09/06/2013 7:48:48 PM PDT
by
potlatch
To: ReaganÃœberAlles
The subjunctive is a harsh mistress, but subtle.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson