[svcw]

As it should

[Berlin_Freeper]

The homosexuals will leave no stone unturned until you have to hide in a closet for being a heterosexual.

[Diana in Wisconsin]

Good. Freaks.

[struggle]

I don’t understand why gays refuse to see this problem in their own community.

[Second Amendment First]

I have no problem with gays donating blood.
Simply label it as “Gay Blood” and let the marketplace decide what to choose.
It would be interesting to see what the libs would choose if they really believed in “choice”.

[gop4lyf]

It’s a shame AIDS didn’t work faster. Maybe homosexuals would have learned to be a lot less promiscuous, and a lot less people would have died from it.

[JamesA]

I’ve given nearly 14 gallons of blood over the years but I will stop immediately if homos are ok’d to give blood.

[Viennacon]

This is where the agenda is very clear. What does not allowing someone to donate blood take away from them?

These people ACTIVELY want to give diseased blood.

[twyn1]

I’ve never understood this push to allow donations from homosexuals. The reason for the ban is based on medical fact. My entire family is no longer allowed to give blood because we lived in Europe during the “mad cow” outbreaks. Even though we are all healthy and were at extremely small risk of exposure, we are still forbidden. That’s the way it is, and I am fine with it; even a miniscule risk of passing something along isn’t worth it.

[Gay State Conservative]

I've only been in a position where I might need blood once...when I had my hip replaced a few years back.The surgeon said that I'd probably need blood during and/or after the surgery and *strongly* encouraged me to store my own blood in advance to get it back,which I did.Of course one can't always know in advance when he/she will need blood.