The Constitutional definition of treason: Art III, Section 3: “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person whall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.”
Adhering to the United States’ enemies, giving them aid and comfort. Bashar Assad is not our enemy. He has done nothing to us. If we arm Al Qaeda who has openly said that they seek to destroy us, supposedly for the purpose of taking out Bashar Assad who is basically an innocent bystander as regards US.... how is that not giving aid and comfort to our sworn enemies? First off it is basically declaring illegal war on an innocent bystander and then fraternizing with our enemy to serve HIS purposes in getting rid of that innocent bystander. That is TOTALLY, TOTALLY different than gathering together a “coalition of the willing” to oust somebody who has sworn to export terrorism to our various countries (as was indicated in the records that were found in Saddam’s palace. Saddam’s son sent out a recruitment letter for jihadists willing to do attacks on American and British interests all over the world, and there was a message from the Al Qaeda people saying that the US knew it was a joint effort between AQ and Iraq so they should expect the US to retaliate against Iraq. Saddam was also on tape saying that the new method of warfare would be terrorists, so that a given country couldn’t be blamed.)
And I really, really doubt that when Ghadaffi’s 20,000+ Manpads went “missing” (cough), somebody in the US who oversaw the unlawful ousting of Ghadaffi to continue the “Arab Spring” in which extremist Islamists ousted and took over from our ALLIES in the “War on Terror” (at the time that we took him out, Ghadaffi was cooperating with us more than any other country by reporting suspected terrorists to us)... was there making the recipients of those weapons sign promises that they would only bring down 747’s that had no Americans on board.
Then there’s the tax exemptions to Obama’s family that is fund-raising for the Muslim Brotherhood. There is also Obama’s signed membership in The New Party, whose goal was to overthrow the US Constitution through covert means. Morsi’s #2 says that Obama is a signed member of the Muslim Brotherhood, which the US military identifies as an extremist organization, and I believe they probably have a plank supporting worldwide sharia, which is a direct enemy of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
I could go on all day, unfortunately. Every enemy this nation has ever had is on Obama’s list of quick-dial friends and always has been. Always welcome to visit the White House. When Bin Laden’s son Hamza was caught at the finish line of the Boston marathon bombing, Obama met with the Saudi ambassador and had the “known terrorist” classification removed from him, had his wife literally “comfort” that sworn enemy who had just blown up little American kids by visiting him in the hospital for the whole terrorist world to see and laugh at, and then exported him on a supposed student visa “overstay” (even though we can’t deport anybody, ever) so that he would evade an angry CIA and Boston Police Department who knew who the guy was and wasn’t about to let him get away.
And then.... Hamza also showed up 3 months later AT THE WHITE HOUSE, at a party for US military, ON JULY 4TH.
Is that “comfort and aid” to a known enemy?
Like I said, I could go on all day. The guy is a foreign enemy combatant. If we can’t get this guy for treason, then nobody will EVER be convicted of treason, even if they nuked the whole country. And there are questions of whether Obama might do that too. I think you’d be hard pressed to find anybody informed, such as we Freepers, who doubts that he is capable of doing it.
I should have said there was a message from AQ to Saddam saying the US knew that 9-11 was a joint effort between AQ and Iraq. This was within a 24-hour time window after Mohammad Atta’s photo had been published and someone had identified him as the person who had been casing the Air Free America in Prague, Czechoslovakia after meeting with one of Saddam’s head guys. The Czechs were livid with America’s CIA for leaking a bunch of info to the press before they could get all their i’s dotted and t’s crossed. The particular timing of that message from AQ to Saddam made it very credible, because it was right after Atta was identified as having been with the Iraqi guy in Prague but before the CIA claimed there was no connection - royally ticking off the Czechs, who basically threw up their hands in disgust at us and figured we need to fight our own battles since we mess up anything that requires tight lips.