Replies

Let me rephrase.

The Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution to protect the people from the U.S. Government. The Will of the People is more important than the U.S. Government.

The Will of the People can elect anyone they choose ... i.e. a person who is not a natural born citizen. Consequently, there is no method to prevent an ineligible person from being sworn in as POTUS if the majority of Electors have voted for him.

This does not mean the Will of the People trump individual rights. Anyone has the right to object to a usurper imposing laws and regulations upon them after they have suffered or been directly threatened with an injury.

For example, Obama signed the ACA into law. Let's say the IRS sends me a notice of compliance with the law or I will be fined $600. If I don't prove I have health insurance or pay the $600, I will be assessed a late payment penalty of 1% charged monthly. Now, I have a particular threat of harm to me based on a law signed by a usurper. I object to the laws signed by a usurper. So, I have standing to sue the U.S. Federal Government to enjoin it from charging fees, taxes or penalties as a result of a law signed by the usurper. The usurper will have to prove he is eligible to be POTUS or waive all taxes, penalties and interest because of my objection.

I cannot have the Court throw out the usurper because the Will of the People supersedes my individual objection to a usurper holding the office of POTUS. My objection to a usurper supersedes the Will of the People when I suffer a particular injury due to a law signed by the usurper. I can object in Federal Court and force the usurper to prove he's eligible or have my taxes, penalties and interest waived because of my objection.

After the usurper leaves office, the DeFacto Officer Doctrine indemnifies the U.S. Government from damages imposed upon it by the Will of the People. Consequently, all laws and regulations imposed on the people by the usurper become unobjectionable, but subject to change by a new President.

The courts threw out the will of the people with CA’s Prop 8.

In fact, the courts do it all the time. And the 20th Amendment specifically says that if the people vote in a President who fails to qualify, that elected person cannot ACT as President. The Constitution itself asserts its supremacy over the Presidential vote. There’s no way to get around that, and I don’t understand why anybody would try. If they don’t qualify they cannot be President. It’s that simple. Otherwise the Constitution’s qualifications mean nothing.