To: Monterrosa-24
Of course many RPG hits that will take out a T-62 will not severely damage an M-1I'm more concerned about MRAPS and APCs in use by police. A MRAP is NOT a battlefield vehicle. Wouldn't last ten minutes with modern anti-armor ordinance. These things that the govt is bestowing on police forces throughout the the land of the formerly free are designed for supressing a civilian population armed with small arms.
19 posted on
11/18/2013 9:04:58 AM PST by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: from occupied ga
Right-O and your key point as I understand it is that the populace is equiped with rifles and other small arms but nothing larger so that the DHS vehicles would have free reign.
I wonder what percentage of such police-type APC vehicles are vulnerable to .50 Barretts?...or even .338 Lapua?
21 posted on
11/18/2013 9:39:33 AM PST by
Monterrosa-24
(...even more American than a French bikini and a Russian AK-47.)
To: from occupied ga
A MRAP is NOT a battlefield vehicle. Wouldn't last ten minutes with modern anti-armor ordinance. These things that the govt is bestowing on police forces throughout the the land of the formerly free are designed for supressing a civilian population armed with small arms.We won't have anti-armor ordinance anyway. Trap 'em, burn 'em.
27 posted on
11/18/2013 11:05:03 AM PST by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson