Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Odd question on online job application
Me

Posted on 11/27/2013 2:29:36 AM PST by Grumpybutt

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
My husband suggested I write a letter to their corporate officers and ask why that question was asked and if they are using the answers as a means to disqualify applicants. I wish now that I had taken a screen shot of it.
1 posted on 11/27/2013 2:29:36 AM PST by Grumpybutt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Grumpybutt

Obamacare has touched every aspect of American Daily Life. It must be fought at every turn.


2 posted on 11/27/2013 2:38:15 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (Did the ancients know they were ancients? Or did they see themselves as presents?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy

Try being 50....old people upset the stats on their group plans.....so they are all “over qualified”.

Thats what I am.....again and again.


3 posted on 11/27/2013 2:45:33 AM PST by Therapsid (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Therapsid

I’m 59 and a white, (Irish/Cherokee), male. Lucky for me I was working before 0bama was elected. Luckier for me, I still have my career. Not a good time to be job searching.


4 posted on 11/27/2013 2:53:14 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (Did the ancients know they were ancients? Or did they see themselves as presents?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Grumpybutt
My husband suggested I write a letter to their corporate officers and ask why that question was asked and if they are using the answers as a means to disqualify applicants. I wish now that I had taken a screen shot of it.

This is why I hate looking for a new job today.

Why can't we just have an honest discussion between the job applicant and the employer? If you accept this job you will have to find insurance elsewhere and you can take it or leave it.

Instead there are loaded questions like this all over the place and if you don't read their mind and answer the right way, you never get the job and never have a clue as to why you don't get the job. So you have no basis on which to improve yourself as an applicant to make your self more attractive as a potential employee.

5 posted on 11/27/2013 3:04:26 AM PST by ClaytonP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grumpybutt

There was a time when that question most likely would have been a harmless effort to determine what benefits you will be seeking if hired. Nowadays, I’d be suspicious of some ulterior motive.


6 posted on 11/27/2013 3:04:51 AM PST by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grumpybutt

I hope you didn’t sign the application with your FreeRepublic name.


7 posted on 11/27/2013 3:05:31 AM PST by Rocky (The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grumpybutt

Welcome to the United Socialist State of America!

The new fundamentally changed America is in your face, and on your back.


8 posted on 11/27/2013 3:07:49 AM PST by PoloSec ( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grumpybutt

“and if they are using the answers as a means to disqualify applicants.”

You’ve got the wrong attitude. You should write to corporate officers and thank them for giving you the opportunity to apply for the job. You should be thankful, and work hard for them to ensure that you make them more money than the pay and benefits that they offer you.

The private sector is not a jobs program. If you are going to this job, assuming you get it, with the idea that they are somehow an evil corporation out to screw the employees then you may actually be a Marxist.

You are not owed a job, yet you sound entitled and disgruntled already. Give these guys a break. They are creating jobs in an environment where it is being highly discouraged through government regulation. Maybe unemployment suits you better?


9 posted on 11/27/2013 3:10:21 AM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClaytonP
Yep, I've been searching since before we even moved (hubby got transferred to a new city) that was over a month ago and still no luck. I gave up looking for something in my field and started looking at retail - thinking that if he gets transferred again I'd have a better chance of transferring too... This experience has been an "eye opener" for sure. It's been a very long time since I had to search for work.

I went back and reapplied with fictitious information just to get a screen grab... the question is neatly tucked in with an Ernst & Young tax credit questionnaire under the questions about having received TANF and are you a US resident.....

 photo cvs-insquest_zps072adb4d.png

10 posted on 11/27/2013 3:20:37 AM PST by Grumpybutt (Pray for our troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

Not sure how you got the idea that I have the wrong attitude. Actually I don’t have the “wrong attitude”, what I do have is the common sense to question some of the questions being asked of people in order to APPLY for a job. Please save your lecture for those who game the system and sit on their asses and don’t get up everyday and search for work because I’m not one of them, nor do I get “unemployment”. Questioning the processes is not the same as being a Marxist and your comment is uncalled for.


11 posted on 11/27/2013 3:31:29 AM PST by Grumpybutt (Pray for our troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Grumpybutt

” Questioning the processes is not the same as being a Marxist and your comment is uncalled for.”

My comment is exactly on target. This employer is making a mistake if they hire you. You do not actually want this job, that much is obvious.

You despise those who are providing you an opportunity to work - because you think that they should somehow tailor the application process to match your sensibilities. You are wrong.


12 posted on 11/27/2013 3:42:09 AM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Grumpybutt

Not participating in their group plan saves them money. Employers typically pay half or more of the premium. All other considerations aside and given two equally qualified candidates, they’d choose the one that was least costly. That can mean salary requirements, benefits or both.


13 posted on 11/27/2013 3:44:08 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Thank you for making my point.


14 posted on 11/27/2013 3:55:28 AM PST by Grumpybutt (Pray for our troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Grumpybutt

This is a common question. Not that it doesn’t give us pause, in this day, but I don’t see that an employee has any choice but to answer it.


15 posted on 11/27/2013 4:14:01 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

How you got all that out of Grumpybutt’s post is beyond me. And, I’m a physicist!

Don’t over-think the problem. Doing that always leads to over engineering.

Cheers!


16 posted on 11/27/2013 4:15:43 AM PST by DoctorBulldog (I can't be a racist because, I can't stand Biden and Pelosi, either!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Grumpybutt
I saw that same thing a little over a year ago when I started work at a new company. It was a requirement of their insurance policy that all employees must have some form of insurance. I have my own, but had to note that on a form to the insurance company.

Not sure if it is O-care related or not.

17 posted on 11/27/2013 4:16:55 AM PST by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Therapsid

It doesn’t get better at 60...


18 posted on 11/27/2013 4:30:23 AM PST by null and void (I'm betting on an Obama Trifecta: A Nobel Peace Prize, an Impeachment, AND a War Crimes Trial...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Grumpybutt

Check “no” and then once hired, of course, re-evaluate your life and perhaps choose “yes”. If they dump you, say “Yes” to the lawsuit.


19 posted on 11/27/2013 4:31:22 AM PST by If You Want It Fixed - Fix It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grumpybutt

If you are former fed worker, just by the size of your salary, you are “over-qualified”.
If your favorite color is not on the screen of choices, i.e., orange, (another psych game), you are “over-qualified”.
If you are over 45, you are “over-qualified”.
If you have prior military experience, you are “over-qualified”, or at least I was, in all of my job hunting in Portland, Oregon.


20 posted on 11/27/2013 4:36:37 AM PST by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson