That’s not what the article said.I copied a direct quote from the article so you’re saying you know more about the case than the author and Orly I take it.Typical guess work on these threads lately.
“That’s not what the article said.I copied a direct quote from the article so you’re saying you know more about the case than the author and Orly I take it.Typical guess work on these threads lately.”
This is his MO. I just encountered him on another thread. He completely misrepresented what the article [at the start of the thread] said, and just as completely misrepresented what I said. When these two falsehoods were pointed out to him, he changed the subject. Very slippery poster w more concern for his agenda than w accuracy or integrity.
In less than 21 days, we’ll all know for absolute certain when Dr. Taitz submits her amended complaint and Judge Hollander rules on it.
Here’s a link to the Judge’s current ruling in its entirety:
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Taitz-v-Colvin-order-to-file-an-amended-complaint1.pdf