1) According to Rossi, he designed and built thermoelectric generators that put out 800 watts but were destroyed in a fire. Of the several he did submit, only one worked and it produce 1 watt.
2) According to Rossi, he had an ecat running in one of his factories for two years. Where is this factory?
3) According to Rossi he was going to have robot plants making millions of ecats.
About that factory:
Before going public with his ECAT fusion invention, Andrea Rossi had also manufactured a boiler, using this method, that has heated his factory Ferrara, a small town in Northeast Italy. Since this boiler has heated the factory for about a year, they were able to make experiments in an actual working reactor. The reactor in Ferrara reactor is similar to the modern ECAT that they are making and has a module of about 20 kilowatts. It provides heat to an area that measures about 1000 square feet. Ferrara is a very cold area in Italy where winter can go on for the duration of five months in a year. With temperatures ranging from 6 to 10 degree Celsius. The reactor was able to provide heat to the office and factory for over a year. This result encouraged Andrea Rossi to make the other modules that later would be tested by other scientists. They are now in the process of building a one megawatt plant.
Now, wouldn't it be far more believable to show the working ecat in his factory then the ridiculous demos he did?
4) According to Rossi, he has factories all over the place, he implied he was going to make ecats in Florida but had to go on record as stating that he wasn't making anything and certainly anything nuclear.
Clearly, anything that begins with, "Rossi says..." needs to be evaluated on his very flexible version of the truth.
It's not about "trusting Rossi". It is about evidence provided by knowledgeable scientists from multiple tests. At some point you have to start looking at the data instead of spouting off negative social factors.
You insist on writing off ALL test data because Rossi was at one time in violation of Italian law, which is ridiculous.
ridiculous demos he did?
***In other words, crappy demos. He gave crappy demos. The fraud angle requires that he would be so masterful a magician (while not even being in the room) that he pulls the wool over 7 PhD scientists and others.
It’s far easier to believe what you just said: He gave ridiculous demos.