Posted on 02/02/2014 8:26:55 AM PST by B4Ranch
There are probably only a handful of people on the entire planet that are that dedicated, so no, it won't work.
“rule by no one,”
Means no rules. . .you make your own rules.
I want what you have, I’ll take it.
No rules or someone to say it is wrong.
If rules say ‘no’ then some one had to write the rules, and if someone says ‘no’ (like the person being robbed) then that person makes the rules.
.
Anarchy = nonsense.
Just the idea of freedom is frightening to some, I see. You’ll do fine under the New World Order policy when you must disrobe in silence before getting on an airplane.
The New England town meeting of old was a very effective model for governing. Towns could band together to protect themselves from a common goal. Town meetings were the source of decision-making for the good of its inhabitants.
There just can't be any real freedom in the global and national messes that are running things now. They're removed from those they supposedly govern, and their only interest is contolling populations for their gains....financial and otherwise.
No rules to stop you from stealing?
No rules to stop you from murder?
No rules to stop you from destroying property or lives?
Seriously. . .and you call that ‘freedom?”?
*SNICKER*
Have a nice day in your anarchy utopia.
And I will do what it takes to get it back.
I don't know. There does seem to be some form of justice involved.
Will contemplate further.
Some jackholes can't discern between a Constitutionalist and a statist and so they're reduced to labeling Constitutionalists as NWO lackeys. Good luck with that.
When your freedom to steal is met by the property owners freedom to shoot you, how ofter do you think you’ll steal? How many bullet wounds can you survive?
LIKE
Yes, the point being the person being robbed and trying to get it back is making a rule, acting as a ‘ruler,’ saying “no, you can’t do that.”
Anarchy is absence of rules and/or the ability to enforce rules.
Last time I will visit this thread or read posts to it, as I think it is a little late (or early) to count as a Friday Silliness thread.
Bring in the Florida retirement home crowds and see if you are still excited.
Anarchy is possible, but only for a brief time before the dictatorship.
Pray for a Sulla, be content with a Pinochet. Fear a Cromwell.
No, I don’t reject it. Do you think we are living under it now?
In any truly anarchic situation, people quickly rally around natural leaders, who re-establish government, of a sort at least. In its initial stages, such government often bears a significant resemblance to rule by street gangs.
The term “anarchy,” in its origins, actually meant “without a leader,” not without government. History shows not one single period of which I’m aware of anything resembling a stable anarchic order. (Anarchic order, of course, being a classic oxymoron.)
The choice is not between rule by leaders and absence of leaders, it’s between how leaders are chosen.
These wild swings in societal organization reflect an immoral an immoderate society. The calls for anarchy always accompany the response to the rise of totalitarianism. Time and time again, anarchists transform themselves into totalitarians after they have destroyed the previous tyranny. True anarchy is just another form of Utopianism; it is impracticable and it inevitably descends into tyranny.
A truly civil and just society requires virtuous populace to take root. We had that at the founding of this nation. We once had a people that believed in and feared their Creator; the people believed in a moral order substantially and essentially based on the Ten Commandments. Today, the virtuous populace is but a relic, a minority rump of its past.
That being said, this current tyranny is IMO, capable of enormous evil, and I would ally myself with the anarchist, at least for the time being, to defeat it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.