Skip to comments.
Three-Rotor Copters Set to Change Civilian, Military Helicopter Designs Forever
http://autos.yahoo.com/news/three-rotor-copters-set-change-civilian-military-helicopter-140054298.html ^
| 2-9-14
| George Kennedy
Posted on 02/09/2014 12:44:07 PM PST by rawhide
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Cool!
1
posted on
02/09/2014 12:44:07 PM PST
by
rawhide
To: rawhide
2
posted on
02/09/2014 12:44:18 PM PST
by
rawhide
To: rawhide
I’ve always wanted to own and fly my own helicopter. They tend to be VERY expensive though.
3
posted on
02/09/2014 12:59:55 PM PST
by
KoRn
(Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
To: rawhide
Counter rotating dual rotor helicopters date back to the 1930’s and 40’s. It looks like this design is intended to compete against the V-22 Osprey for speed. I wonder what the range is. Could these be a good option for servicing offshore oil platforms?
4
posted on
02/09/2014 1:00:53 PM PST
by
Paleo Conservative
(Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not really out to get you.)
To: rawhide
There sure are a lot of white males in the stands.
5
posted on
02/09/2014 1:01:45 PM PST
by
ansel12
(Ben Bradlee -- JFK told me that "he was all for people's solving their problems by abortion".)
To: rawhide
Looks like the test was done at their North Palm facility along Beeline Highway. NOTAM area but fun to watch what is flying around this area.
6
posted on
02/09/2014 1:03:33 PM PST
by
Joe Boucher
((FUBO) obammy lied and lied and lied)
To: rawhide
Looks like a variation of a Kamov product, plus the tail rotor for forward propulsion.
7
posted on
02/09/2014 1:05:07 PM PST
by
Fred Hayek
(The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
To: rawhide
even makes a kickass sound!
8
posted on
02/09/2014 1:05:57 PM PST
by
bigbob
(The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
To: bigbob
Kinda like a NASCAR, F1, bandsaw mill combination.
To: rawhide
Pretty cool, but when are they bringing out the green eco-friendly electric version. ?
I know, I know, don't give Obama any ideas to toss a few billions away...
10
posted on
02/09/2014 1:13:19 PM PST
by
Popman
("Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God" - Thomas Jefferson)
To: rawhide
The prop at the aft of the X2 is mostly for propulsion, allowing is to hit speeds of 250 knots (290 mph)With that type of speed I wonder what the range is on this beast ?
I'm sure it takes a much larger engine to push the torque needed to turn two rotors...
11
posted on
02/09/2014 1:20:50 PM PST
by
Popman
("Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God" - Thomas Jefferson)
To: Paleo Conservative
It’s a technology demonstrator at this point and not necessarily viable as an operational concept. Scaling up to an operational design would be as huge a challenge as was the steps from the XV-15 to the V-22. Success is possible but not guaranteed. For example, what about external sling loads that are as a practical metter restricted to 150 kts. And there is the question of how many troops could a full-scale aircraft carry?
TC
To: rawhide
Random remark, but I sure do wish we could stop measuring air speed in “knots”. Every time I hear that, I feel like I’m reaching for a Whitworth wrench to work on an MG, or standing on the deck of a sailing ship next to Admiral Nelson. Talk about archaic.
13
posted on
02/09/2014 1:25:17 PM PST
by
Hardastarboard
(The question of our age is whether a majority of Americans can and will vote us all into slavery.)
To: Popman
www.zee.aero
The only problem is private silicon valley types are financing this project. I’m sure Obama will get a few billion to them one of these days.
Don’t expect to see these on the road anytime soon. The concept of a flying car will never be a financially viable project. Especially the ZEE which is electric.
To: eartrumpet
Yeah, it’s certainly not what you normally expect to hear from a helicopter passing overhead.
15
posted on
02/09/2014 1:26:35 PM PST
by
FAA
To: Popman
Top speed: 299 mph (481 km/h)
Range: 808 miles (1,300 km)
16
posted on
02/09/2014 1:27:25 PM PST
by
rawhide
To: rawhide
Since the lower rotor is in the downwash from the upper rotor, I wonder how much lift it actually generates. Remember, the Osprey had trouble descending in its own downwash. However, the counter-rotation does cancel out the torque of the two rotors.
Then there's that line from the old song Give Me Operations, "Don't give me a P-38, the props they counter-rotate..."
17
posted on
02/09/2014 1:28:51 PM PST
by
JoeFromSidney
(Book: Resistance to Tyranny. Buy from Amazon.)
To: Hardastarboard
Keep knots youu landlubber, we don’t need your kind of jerk flying aircraft!
18
posted on
02/09/2014 1:29:21 PM PST
by
dalereed
To: rawhide
19
posted on
02/09/2014 1:30:44 PM PST
by
MHGinTN
(Being deceived can be cured.)
To: Paleo Conservative; All
Thank you for mentioning the Osprey. When I saw the three-rotor copter video I wondered about the future of the Osprey.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson