If ...IF the kids had a gun, all this would be different.Very different.
My understanding is the kids drove off and then came back. To get rid of the gun...the one that the police coudn’t find. If they did drive off and come back, I would have had to acquit, on the basis that there was a very probable issue of a gun being pointed at Dunn adn they drove off to get rid of it..and then there is my reasonable doubt.
Just why Dunn should have stayed at the scene and been the one to call the cops, just like Zimmerman did. By running he came close to admitting to murder.
His problem was he spoke to his girlfriend and the cops after the shooting and didn't mention that he saw a gun. After he spoke to his lawyer, he mentioned the gun for the first time. The prosecution ripped him up for that. (That's an idiot of a lawyer, BTW.)