Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Errant
The distance of Comet 209P/Linear's orbit to where the Surface of Earth WILL BE in its orbital plane on May 24, 2014 at 00:00:00 ~ is Those numbers decrease my concern level considerably from the "about 18,600 miles" that I commented on in comment #56.
That's a lot further out than John Bochanski's article stating which figured to be about 18,600 miles.

I didn't get it from JPL's models, but I run Stellarium 0.12.4 for Earth's distance from the Sun on May 24, 2014 at 00:00:00 Central Daylight Savings Time as 1.00571510 AU .
It showed Comet 209P/Linear distance from the Sun as it is on the same laditude of Earth's Orbital Plane on May 20, 2014 at 00:00:00 Central Daylight Savings Time, is 0.99639024 AU.
59 posted on 03/01/2014 4:28:47 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: Yosemitest
I need to get a copy of Stellarium for myself.

The issue, as I see it with Linear, is the fact that it has broken up. That means there could be some large objects hiding in the dust trail, trailing the main body of debris. Since the earth is crossing through that same trail close behind this main body passage (relatively), it should mean the chances of encountering larger objects in this particular comet's dust trail are greater than normal, or of say a single body comet's trail in which the main nucleus passed months before the earth encounters its dust trail.

No model is going to be able to predict this. It's something we'll just have to wait to see if we do or don't encounter larger objects, unless of course NASA wishes to share radar returns or observations with us. Not likely of that happening if there is something coming our way and they thought it might cause a panic.

There was a comet that we watched breakup some years back (I forget the name now) which now consists of about 60 objects NASA is tracking. The pieces are presently scattered over a trail with millions of miles between the separated chunks.

Which brings up another question in my mind: Why isn't NASA putting out more detailed data on Linear? Just seems kind of strange, if you ask me.

Btw, good work on the numbers!

61 posted on 03/01/2014 5:22:31 PM PST by Errant (Surround yourself with intelligent and industrious people who help and support each other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson