Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Nero Germanicus
The first was James Buchanan. Buchanan missed being eligible for the constitution’s Article II, Section 1 grandfather clause by four years. He was born in 1791 and the Constitution was ratified in 1787.

Buchanan’s father (also named James Buchanan) was a citizen of Ireland who had immigrated to the United States and became naturalized as an American citizen.

The information not supplied here is important. Buchanan's father immigrated to the colonies in 1783 and when the Constitution was adopted (1787) all residents of the United States had citizenship (Naturalization) conferred upon them immediately. James was born four years later in 1791 to a now recognized by "Naturalization Law" American Citizen. So.....James was born of the soil and born of the blood.....a "Natural Born Citizen".

What exactly is it about this apparently difficult (for you) scenario that you don't understand?

187 posted on 03/11/2014 1:36:29 PM PDT by Diego1618 (Put "Ron" on the Rock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]


To: Diego1618

As I said, it was the operation of BRITISH law that made both of the Buchanans British citizens for life as well as American citizens, the father naturalized and the son a Citizen of the United States at Birth.

What part of “Nemo potest exuere patriam” meaning “No one can cast off his country” didn’t you understand?


194 posted on 03/11/2014 7:17:32 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus (PALIN/CRUZ: 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson