As far as Oregon's concerned, March 22 should be interesting...
The complicit media has done such a good job for their masters that only a small minority have any concern at all...all the while the government keeps revising ALARA limits and the EPA is having some quite interesting things to say about their new PAG.
Fwiw, open this map and click 'all' in the upper right.. It's a sample map, but they seem to keep it updated. MY major problem with it is that it doesn't show offshore levels at Fukushima and that they drew a straight line across the Pacific for measurements rather than following the current eastward. I don't believe it's a realistic portrait of what's there, but interesting, nonetheless (and a whole lot more than NOAA is doing, the responsible agency for testing the ocean, which is nothing, at least publicly).
Also fwiw, I have documentation stating the Cesium 137 concentrations in the Pacific in 2010 from all the nuclear testing & post-England & Russia nuke accidents was:
.00000009 Bq/cubic meter.
On the basis of what appear to be 'low' levels (certainly when compared to EPA's action levels) of contamination, do the math: One sample at 4.5 Bq/cu meter is 5 x 10 to the 7th power...50,000,000 times background pre-Fukushima. Again, FWIW...
Thanks for the interesting take on media and EPA and the links. Not sure I would want to sign up for March 22...