I assure you that sealife off the coast of Japan is heavily scrutinized. Because it is relevant near the source.
If you had any sense of dilution factors, you would understand that ut simply isn’t worth the expense to monitor west coast sealife radiation.
Get back to me when you learn of any Instances of elevated strontium or cobalt in fish smuggled in from Japan to the west coast fish markets. Because thats the only evidence that your silly biological vector theory will have any validity
You “assure” me?
That’s it?
Well, that pretty much nails the whole thing right there, don’t it?
Why didn’t I just ask for that in the first place?
After all, you have the ONLY evidence criteria that would validate “my silly biological vector theory.”
Of radiation concentration through linked interdependent biological ecologies?
Which of course is ENTIRELY different from, say, MILLIONS of other toxin concentrations studied by ENTIRE FIELDS of science that aggregate from the same mechanism.
Entirely.Different.
Except I really must protest, because I just can’t take credit for an entire field of study. You know, the “silly biological vector theory” that DOESN”T apply to radiation acumulation. That one. The stuff of entire fields of science.
That one.
Unlike my silly gasoline combustion engine theory. Or my silly heavier-than-air human flight theory. Or my silly electronic computing device theory.
Go away, troll.