Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: wonkowasright

Thanks for the links. I can’t compare with the 40s 50s, 60s.

They did go from testing in the Pacific in the 40s to testing underground....

No idea about radiation amounts from those tests compared to Fukushima, but 3 reactors blew up, still leaking.

I just would feel better if I can do some baseline tests and then continue to test in future....I would like to test stuff I catch.


26 posted on 03/09/2014 6:54:30 PM PDT by Freedom56v2 ("If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait till it is free"--PJ O'rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: bushwon

Ya. Thank blogger btw has been at it since day one almost.

IMHO Fukushima is as bad or worse than Chernobyl but for some reason its downplayed. Maybe its because the company that makes the reactors owns a good bit of US press too.


28 posted on 03/09/2014 6:56:48 PM PDT by wonkowasright (Wonko from outside the asylum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: bushwon

“I just would feel better if I can do some baseline tests and then continue to test in future....I would like to test stuff I catch.”

Even during the worst discharges, it was barely detectable in the water offshore from Japan. Imagine the zillions of gallons of seawater dilution before reaching our coast.


32 posted on 03/09/2014 6:57:34 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson