Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Microsoft releases MS-DOS 2.0 Source Code
Computer History Museum ^ | 3/25/2014 | Microsoft

Posted on 03/25/2014 1:03:03 PM PDT by Dalberg-Acton

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: BfloGuy
Sort of like how the greatest poetry was written when the expectations of rhyme and rhythm were taken seriously. Once those were gone, it all dissolved into strings of meaninglessness.

To be fair there's some good stuff in musicals — the medium almost forces it. That said, I think the quality of [modern] musicals could use a bit more consideration of rhyme/rhythm/meter.

41 posted on 03/25/2014 4:41:47 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ducttape45
"Wow! I still remember using MS-DOS 1.1 and 2.0."

Actually, DOS 7.22 was the last useful product Microsoft sold (until Windows 7).

42 posted on 03/25/2014 7:50:29 PM PDT by norwaypinesavage (for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Dalberg-Acton
"I worked for a company in 1976 that had a 8080 "

Gotcha beat. In 1974 I used an Intel 4004. It didn't even have a console. We used Tektronix CRTs with built in cassette recorders to store the data. Intel bragged that it took a total of 26 people all of nine months to design the chip.

43 posted on 03/25/2014 7:56:27 PM PDT by norwaypinesavage (for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage

That’s almost prehistoric. You win!


44 posted on 03/25/2014 8:17:58 PM PDT by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

Re: formally proven OS

It has been done, but an operating system is kinda useless without apps. I’d love to see something like that, but I suspect you’ll only ever see it as a niche product. ATM machines would be an excellent application.


45 posted on 03/25/2014 10:19:29 PM PDT by zeugma (Is it evil of me to teach my bird to say "here kitty, kitty"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
It has been done, but an operating system is kinda useless without apps. I’d love to see something like that, but I suspect you’ll only ever see it as a niche product. ATM machines would be an excellent application.

I fear you might be right about niche usage; but I think that it would give a major leg-up to a consumer product. I mean imagine the marketing saying it's impossible to crash and being right; and from a security standpoint it offers some amazing assurances (ref: the Ironsides DNS, No Single-Packet Denial of Service or Remote Code Execution Vulnerabilities).

46 posted on 03/25/2014 10:29:18 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Dalberg-Acton
Microsoft BOUGHT DOS from Seattle Computer Products in 1980 for $50,000! Just in time to license it en-mass on IBM PCs.

Accidental Empires by Robert X. Cringely, pp. 132-133

47 posted on 03/25/2014 10:55:51 PM PDT by matt1234 (Hitler blamed the Jews. Obama blames the Tea Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage
7.22? I thought the last DOS was 6.22?

Anyone?

48 posted on 03/26/2014 4:03:15 AM PDT by ducttape45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: matt1234
Wow, you hit upon one of the biggest secrets in IT history. I always heard, though, that Gates "appropriated" the DOS code from it's original inventor and then used licensing trickery to keep him down while he started making his millions selling MS-DOS.

Please correct me if I'm wrong.

49 posted on 03/26/2014 4:05:33 AM PDT by ducttape45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ducttape45

Right on all accounts. The other factor is that Bill Gates was from an extremely wealthy family and his mommy, Mrs. Gates, sat on the board of directors of IBM. So one day, after they discussed that they had this little hardware thing (the IBM XT) but weren’t particularly interested in software for it, she dropped a suggestion to have them buy her son’s — whereupon he went out and bought one from Seattle Computer to sell to IBM. I have heard this story many times.


50 posted on 03/26/2014 4:22:04 AM PDT by wildandcrazyrussian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ducttape45

I think you’re right. 6.22 looks correct now that I see it written down. It came as a package with Windows 3.1 or maybe Windows 95, on a separate set of disks.


51 posted on 03/26/2014 4:46:32 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage

Bingo! It was packaged with Windows 3.1 and Windows for Workgroups 3.11. You installed the MS-DOS first, then Windows second. It was the last time we would ever see DOS all by itself.


52 posted on 03/26/2014 9:11:29 AM PDT by ducttape45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ducttape45
Wow, you hit upon one of the biggest secrets in IT history. I always heard, though, that Gates "appropriated" the DOS code from it's original inventor and then used licensing trickery to keep him down while he started making his millions selling MS-DOS. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

In his book, Accidental Empires, Cringely asserts that Seattle Computer Products stole chunks of the DOS code from another company. Then MS bought DOS from Seattle Computer Products.

As far as "licensing trickery" is concerned, I don't know the legal details of the agreement(s).

One interesting fact is that IBM wanted to buy the software for its new PCs rather than develop it in-house. IBM wanted an OS and programming language. MS, when first approachd by IBM, had the programming language but not the OS. So, they went across town and bought DOS.

53 posted on 03/26/2014 9:22:16 AM PDT by matt1234 (Hitler blamed the Jews. Obama blames the Tea Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson