Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: wardaddy
Appears it's mostly about feelings and projection.

Next we will hear that songs about...well..the ups and downs of male female reactivity, are verboten, especially if the spouse of an artist does them selves in.

137 posted on 03/30/2014 10:10:44 AM PDT by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: going hot; wardaddy
Nobody said anything about forbidding any songs. I "hoped", to quote me, if the man would have the discretion and respect to voluntarily avoid a song that, given his long career of songs, can simply be avoided on his upcoming tour. Having spent 40 years in marketing, I think like that. It's pro-Mick, not anti-male.

That song in particular mentions his lover's clothes. The lady was a clothing designer. Back away from that song, Mick.

143 posted on 03/30/2014 10:34:37 AM PDT by Albion Wilde ("The commenters are plenty but the thinkers are few." -- Walid Shoebat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

To: going hot

Rolling Stones

Woman bashers?

On a conservative forum....whew

Some things I read here

Bump what you said

I could tell you why the forum is often like this but it would hurt feeling of otherwise decent folks


171 posted on 03/30/2014 10:07:53 PM PDT by wardaddy (the real battle is what do we replace America as we knew it with....and will we fight..literally)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson