Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DesertRhino
I have to lose a song because she did that? Is she so clean that the world needs to lose a song in her honor? Please,,,

You've never lost someone before their time, right? It ain't pretty.

The songs will still be there on records. But there is something obscene about singing such misogyny in the months after her death. It would be like those guys with a 30-year marriage and four grown kids who seek an annulment from the Catholic Church so they can marry their secretary. Leaves a bad taste. Please is right.

43 posted on 03/29/2014 10:47:44 PM PDT by Albion Wilde ("The commenters are plenty but the thinkers are few." -- Walid Shoebat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Albion Wilde

If we go by that standard, we’ll be left with very little music. Silliness. And also ungrateful. Even in collapse of a business, she had a lifestyle that many can only dream of, and millions in the bank.

And she threw away the one most precious thing a human can possess. Her life as a “failure” would be a pampered lifestyle for most people.


48 posted on 03/29/2014 11:00:49 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson