Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo

Not necessarily. In automotive, it’s common to keep the same part number for newer revisions of parts where the newer revision is a drop-in replacement for the old.


11 posted on 03/30/2014 1:35:11 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Still Thinking
newer revisions of parts where the newer revision is a drop-in replacement for the old.

That's what Deviations or Waivers are for. The configuration should be recorded down to it's Least Replaceable Unit.
Proper identification and baselining is essential.

13 posted on 03/30/2014 1:40:30 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking

Right you are. It is termed “running change”

Happens all the time with OEM of all kinds


22 posted on 03/30/2014 1:58:50 PM PDT by QualityMan (Don't Tread on Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking

............Not necessarily. In automotive, it’s common to keep the same part number for newer revisions of parts where the newer revision is a drop-in replacement for the old.................

I’m sure that is true, but then how is the parts department at your local chevy dealer know that he is dispensing the safety modified part????

Maybe a suffix, like 12345678A????


27 posted on 03/30/2014 2:12:32 PM PDT by Noob1999 (Loose Lips, Sink Ships)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson