Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Renfield
Indeed, this makes perfect sense. There can no longer be doubt that the four evangelists clearly loved Jesus, but thought he was so wrong to include women in his world.

They dutifully reported the importance he felt women were in his ministry. They just thought that was an error. When they were reporting on Jesus' life, therefore, it stands to reason they would omit his wife, just air brush her from the picture. They must have been right, too, because they all did it. Since they represent 100% of the evangelists of The Good News, it's a settled view.

What the heck, the synoptic gospels were written so soon after Jesus' death that those evangelists would know as first hand eye witnesses that Mrs. Christ had to be expunged if Jesus' life was to have the proper impact. And God knows Jesus certainly would be clueless on impacts and invitations and vocations.

John came along so far down the road that he was probably senile when he wrote his. Nevertheless, some of his writings have convinced me that Jesus thought there was hope for salvation for even such as me i.e. John wrote his for me, personally.

Maybe we can get The Good Book fixed in the next edition.

48 posted on 04/11/2014 8:14:08 AM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: stevem

Steve, does the “m” stand for “moronic”? Wait a while until you get out of high schoolm and come back and say something intelligent.


86 posted on 04/14/2014 6:17:35 AM PDT by Nabber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson