High-handed responses do not befit those who engage in science. Leave that to the liberals and take the high road.
Scientific law does not describe theory; it’s the other way around (to wit, the theory seeks to answer “What is electromagnetism” versus “What does electromagnetism do” when related to this particular phenomenon). As for the off-topic subject you insist on persisting to discuss, there aren’t any scientific laws to fit with it; there are a number of unrelated observations that a zealous cadre are desperately trying to stitch together in an unscientific way. But we do have freedom of religion in the USA, so I try not to treat such devotees as spitefully as they want to treat me.
It appears that the entirety of your "scientific education" consists of reading creationism literature. That stuff not only is not scientific, it isn't even based in the Bible.
There is a lot of real scientific literature out there, much of it written for lay people. If you have a real interest in science and genuinely want to learn, I would suggest looking into it. Science Daily (www.sciencedaily.com), Live Science (www.livescience.com), Science magazine (www.sciencemag.org), etc., are all places to start. I am pretty confident, however, that you will not be running to those websites to read about real evolutionary science...
BTW, Science magazine is one of the top scientific journals in the world. Although you need a subscription to read the research articles, it has plenty of open access articles written for lay-people.