You chose to not link to the actual articles. Instead you chose to author the post yourself, and then in the first response post you went to the trouble of commenting only upon the presence of the Right Sector volunteers. AS the material you posted stands, its singular references only to the presence of the Right Sector volunteers strongly implies you are reporting to the readers any nus which may attach to the Right Sector must now also attach to the elite National Guard of the Ukraine. You focus on the presence of the Right Sector in the National Guard is the one and only theme present in what you personally wrote.
You have no credibility. You made an ad hom attack in post #2 that I devastated in post #4. You followed that up with quoting me in post #13, and I devastated that post by showing proof from the Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll, quoting them, which showed that a majority of Americans are anti-interventionism. It stretches across party lines. And now you finally get around to trying yet another angle and line of attack... In this post, you use the word “strongly implies.” That is your misrepresentation of what i posted and yet another attempt at trying to pigeonhole me. Right Sector is mentioned once in the first post by me. It is mentioned once in the second post by me. In both posts (#1 and #2) I list all three that the article from EuroMaidan listed. ....