Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/07/2014 3:25:00 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BenLurkin

Aurora = Cold Fusion?


2 posted on 05/07/2014 3:27:55 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Great news! Fusion power is only 20 years away!


3 posted on 05/07/2014 3:36:27 PM PDT by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin; SunkenCiv

http://mms.gsfc.nasa.gov

NASA is launching this constellation of four satellites later this year to record magnetic reconnection events.


4 posted on 05/07/2014 3:43:55 PM PDT by Explorer89 (And now, let the wild rumpus start!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

IMHO, pouring vast amounts of money into hot fusion is a waste of resources. Cold fusion has already been demonstrated hundreds if not thousands of times.


6 posted on 05/07/2014 3:44:26 PM PDT by babygene ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

No need, according now-zotted FReeper kevmo, cold fusion has been solved.


10 posted on 05/07/2014 4:33:54 PM PDT by CodeToad (Arm Up! They Are!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

This reminds me of cavitation. Wasn’t it also considered for fusion?


11 posted on 05/07/2014 4:37:42 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

“secret... magnetic reconnection”

The process in T shock tubes which produced dense million degree plasmas for the Naval Research Laboatories in 1958. And was well publicized at the time.

It is a likely path, though shock tubes aren’t a good geometry.


22 posted on 05/07/2014 6:49:36 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin; skinkinthegrass; samtheman; SunkenCiv; MHGinTN; babygene; Moonman62; CodeToad; ...

Here is a fusion company out of Vancouver. Its called General Fusion. The founder Michel Laberge. Its been at work since 2002. The guy has done a presentation at a TED conference there. The company has about 60 million worth of funding (including funding from the canadian government, and a big staff that’s currently building a fusion machine.) Does anyone understand fusion designs well enough to know whether this design is within the design margins of what might be a successful fusion machine. Does anyone understand fusion well enough to know whether the speaker at the TED conference knows what he’s talking about—even if you might disagree with him.

https://www.ted.com/talks/michel_laberge_how_synchronized_hammer_strikes_could_generate_nuclear_fusion

https://www.ted.com/speakers/michel_laberge
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Fusion
http://www.canadianbusiness.com/technology-news/general-fusion-new-ceo-nathan-gilliland/
http://recode.net/2014/03/18/the-future-may-be-getting-close-to-reality-in-vancouver-with-d-wave-and-general-fusion/


23 posted on 05/07/2014 6:49:39 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson