Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: massmike

Color me highly skeptical. Tobacco, as such, is not particularly more hazardous or toxic than just about any other plant product. The smoke from burning tobacco is actually quite similar to smoke from burning cotton, wood, or other plants.

The reason cigarette smoke is hazardous is simply because people routinely inhale it deeply into their lungs in massive quantities over long periods of time, because of the addictive qualities of nicotine. It’s not that there’s anything all that unusually hazardous about the smoke itself.

Since cigarettes are mainly tobacco and paper (wood/cellulose), I find it difficult to imagine discarded butts as all that toxic. But possibly there’s something unusually hazardous about the filters.


11 posted on 05/09/2014 1:30:36 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan

The filters are plastic. They do not biodegrade.


13 posted on 05/09/2014 1:42:32 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan
Urine from all those wild animals are polluting our forests every day. Millions of gallons
of urine are poured onto the sacred ground from just Deer in our great and glorious
perfect utopia. Ban DEER, they piss Ammonia.
15 posted on 05/09/2014 1:49:08 PM PDT by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan
11 Color me highly skeptical. Tobacco, as such, is not particularly more hazardous or toxic than just about any other plant product. The smoke from burning tobacco is actually quite similar to smoke from burning cotton, wood, or other plants.

Your logic is spot on.

The reason cigarette smoke is hazardous is simply because people routinely inhale it deeply into their lungs in massive quantities over long periods of time, because of the addictive qualities of nicotine. It’s not that there’s anything all that unusually hazardous about the smoke itself.

CO in the gas phase is pretty bad, but it is present in all combustion/pyrolysis by-products. The "tar" contains many carcinogenic compounds, but so does almost all combustion by-products.

Since cigarettes are mainly tobacco and paper (wood/cellulose), I find it difficult to imagine discarded butts as all that toxic. But possibly there’s something unusually hazardous about the filters.

The U.S. market primarily uses the polymer cellulose acetate in cigarette filters. The polymer itself is not hazardous, but it does not biodegrade well at all. Some overseas markets use paper (cellulose) filters. They provide a different "taste" because they don't quite filter out the same compounds as cellulose acetate. But they do biodegrade. Of course, someone will complain that they are toxic sponges containing the "tar" that is leached out by the rain and contaminating the environment.

25 posted on 05/09/2014 2:54:46 PM PDT by MacNaughton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan

A big part of the problem is all the chemical additives that are put in cigarettes by the tobacco companies. If you must smoke, smoke tobacco as God created it, not the chemical laden crap from the corporate pushers.


26 posted on 05/09/2014 2:55:54 PM PDT by Fresh Wind (The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson