Skip to comments.
Woman, 24, faces wiretapping charge after recording her own arrest over 'drunken dispute'
dailymail ^
| 13 May 2014
| Snejana Farberov
Posted on 05/13/2014 8:38:41 AM PDT by dennisw
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
05/13/2014 8:38:41 AM PDT
by
dennisw
To: dennisw
Guilty? Not guilty? photos at source
2
posted on
05/13/2014 8:39:12 AM PDT
by
dennisw
(The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
To: dennisw
I think she did the right thing.
3
posted on
05/13/2014 8:39:51 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
"The bravest are surely those who have the clearest vision
of what is before them, glory and danger alike,
and yet notwithstanding, go out to meet it." ~Thucydides
Please support Free Republic
click the pic
4
posted on
05/13/2014 8:39:55 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: dennisw
She must be 24 years old, according to the article.
To: dennisw
Under a Massachusetts state law, it is illegal to record someone’s voice without the person’s knowledge or permission.
If that law applied to the police they would have a hard time doing any wire taps in MA. But as in most cases I am sure the govt exempted itself from the law.
6
posted on
05/13/2014 8:44:50 AM PDT
by
logic101.net
(How many more children must die on the altar of gun control?)
To: dennisw
I guess they (Taxachusetts) aren’t aware of the NSA.
7
posted on
05/13/2014 8:52:53 AM PDT
by
BerryDingle
(I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
To: dennisw
If you are in a public place, then why is two-party consent needed? Any schmo on the street could have been recording her arrest. Isn’t the idea that she was being disorderly evidence that this had gotten loud?
To: dennisw
No chance she’s guilty. Especially with a half bottle of vodka in her!
9
posted on
05/13/2014 8:58:47 AM PDT
by
neodad
(USS Vincennes (CG-49) Freedom's Fortress)
To: dennisw
jury nullification. Refuse to convict on the wiretap charge.
10
posted on
05/13/2014 9:10:22 AM PDT
by
DesertRhino
(I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
To: neodad
Don’t be fooled. She’s using “the angles.”
11
posted on
05/13/2014 9:12:40 AM PDT
by
bolobaby
To: dennisw; Alaska Wolf; TexasFreeper2009; DCBryan1; Slings and Arrows; Doomonyou; oh8eleven; ...
JBT Ping list
12
posted on
05/13/2014 9:17:32 AM PDT
by
null and void
(When was the last time you heard anyone say: "It's a free country"?)
To: logic101.net
“But as in most cases I am sure the govt exempted itself from the law.”
I’m sure they have to get warrants for wiretaps, just like anywhere else.
To: DesertRhino
Judges routinely throw these laws out if they come to court. The standard practice is for the police to use the law to arrest the person and get their phone, then they can delete the evidence. Then, the DAs decline to prosecute, so the case never gets in front of a judge who can throw out the law.
To: logic101.net
umm, in those cases the police have gotten a warrant approved by a judge
To: GeronL
I agree.
Well, not the drunk and disorderly part. But I support her right to record conversations in which she is a participant.
To: Larry Lucido
Especially with cops and other agents of the government.
17
posted on
05/13/2014 9:45:42 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
To: GeronL
To: dennisw
My sister,who lives there,mentioned this to me,She said that if she’s on the jury she’s voting “not guilty”.And so would I.
To: dennisw
Doesn't matter.She could be as ugly as sin and she's *still* not guilty on the wiretap charge in this kind of situation.The law,as enforced in this case,is simply an attempt to coverup official misconduct.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson