Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: digger48

Opinions on abortion have changed somewhat in recent years. Now more than half of Americans might be considered pro-life. I think that part of the reason for this is the refusal to be silent. I don’t mean an in-your-face, strident attitude, but a respectful willingness to say that you think that abortion is wrong. Pro-life forces have also been on the offensive, not always on the defensive. Cries for overturning Roe v. Wade, whether there is a chance of that happening or not, tended to put abortion proponents on the defensive.

The fight concerning homosexuality has not yet followed that same path. Those of us who oppose homosexuality have obviously been on the defensive for years. (I am speaking of us as a group. I personally have not, and I know that many of you have not.) It is past time for a renewed effort by all to respectfully speak out, saying that we believe homosexuality to be wrong. We also need to regain the offensive. I think that one minor way to do that, at least in part, is to begin calling for the repeal of Lawrence v. Texas.


12 posted on 05/13/2014 5:55:49 PM PDT by Engraved-on-His-hands (Conservative 2016!! The Dole, H.W. Bush, McCain, Romney experiment has failed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Engraved-on-His-hands

“We also need to regain the offensive. I think that one minor way to do that, at least in part, is to begin calling for the repeal of Lawrence v. Texas.”

Yes, Lawrence needs to be repealed, but navigating such a case to the SCOTUS that would overturn Lawrence may be somewhat complicated.

It would take a plaintiff to sue a state on the basis that the legalization of sodomy infringes on their constitutional rights.


29 posted on 05/13/2014 6:38:27 PM PDT by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands

Fighting the normalization of homosexuality is harder, but it can be done. We need social science stats and a regular campaign pointing out that homosexuality is abnormal and that the APA’s switch in 1972 was done for politics and not for science.


32 posted on 05/13/2014 6:40:23 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands

Good point. And that is how SCOTUS is responding. They are obviously taking two paths on two issue and just letting it “sink in” via lower Court rulings.

1. When they struck down DOMA and took a hands off approach to Full Faith and Credit etc, it is clear that it is just a matter of time before “Gay Marriage” is the law of the land and it may not be outlawed.

2. 2nd Amendment. SCOTUS has let several Cir Court decisions stand that permit a State to limit gun ownership to in home protection only. Now while it appears it will leave this to the States, it is clear they do not think that the 2nd Amendment extends to anything more than home defense and hunting.

The world in which we find ourselves. I’m glad I’m quite old.


47 posted on 05/13/2014 7:48:03 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands

As long as Anthony Kennedy serves on the Supreme Court sane Americans can never be on the offensive. He will be the worthless anti-God POS that says anyone can get “married” in the United States. It’s coming just as sure as the sun is coming up tomorrow morning.


64 posted on 05/14/2014 8:39:20 AM PDT by NKP_Vet ("It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died;we should thank God that such men lived" ~ Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson