Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaNew

Read the article. The foster parents did adopt the child.

The father’s rights were terminated since he had been sentenced for more than 10 years and the child was under 8 (TN law). And the mother waived her rights to the child.

The child’s paternal grandmother wanted custody, I don’t know why they didn’t give her to her.

But at some point the father’s sentence got commuted to 8 years, and he never waived his rights to the kid. He won in appeals court on the grounds that the court didn’t follow due process in the adoption process.


11 posted on 05/16/2014 10:45:13 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: DannyTN

That poor girl will be living in a home where the mother will resent her being there. The mother obviously didn’t want her, so chances are the mother will indeed be abusive.


12 posted on 05/16/2014 10:50:42 PM PDT by CorporateStepsister (I am NOT going to force a man to make my dreams come true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN

Yes, it is strange that child protection did not place the child with family members, especially the paternal grandmother, in the first place.

In returning the girl back to her biological father, one would think the court should have at least set up a transitional period.


22 posted on 05/16/2014 11:49:13 PM PDT by Fishing-guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson