To: FlJoePa
I didn’t see anything new in the trailer. I used to think that movie was the actual story of King Arthur. It’s not even close, however. It takes some of the stories and changes the characters as well as the context to create something entirely different. Still, it’s one of my favorite movies.
5 posted on
06/21/2014 2:32:31 PM PDT by
Telepathic Intruder
(The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
To: Telepathic Intruder
There wasn’t anything new - it was just another guy’s view on how he’d do the trailer - using original scenes.
I don’t think Boorman set out to make a documentary.
6 posted on
06/21/2014 2:35:31 PM PDT by
FlJoePa
("Success without honor is an unseasoned dish; it will satisfy your hunger, but it won't taste good")
To: Telepathic Intruder
There are many different versions of the King Arthur legend. Some details very from account to account.
To: Telepathic Intruder
I didn’t see anything new in the trailer. I used to think that movie was the actual story of King Arthur. It’s not even close, however. It takes some of the stories and changes the characters as well as the context to create something entirely different. Still, it’s one of my favorite movies. To be fair, people have been doing that since the 12th Century.
And it's closer than "The True Story Behind the Legend"
34 posted on
06/22/2014 7:10:43 PM PDT by
Oztrich Boy
(Wikipedia is wrong. who knew?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson